Title
Consider taking a position on Assembly Bill 280, by Assembly Member Luis Alejo (D-30), regarding voting rights, which would establish a state preclearance system applicable only to Monterey, Kings and Yuba Counties. (ADDED VIA ADDENDUM)
Report
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors consider taking a position on Assembly Bill 280, by Assembly Member Luis Alejo (D-30), regarding voting rights, which would establish a state preclearance system applicable only to Monterey, Kings and Yuba Counties.
SUMMARY/DISCUSSION
Assembly Member Luis Alejo (D-30) introduced legislation, Assembly Bill (AB) 280, which pertains to voting rights, and which would establish a state preclearance system applicable only to Monterey, Kings and Yuba Counties.
The Federal Voting Rights Act of 1965 was designed to prohibit and prevent discriminatory voting practices. The Act provides that a change in voting procedures may not take effect in a state or political subdivision that is covered by the preclearance requirements of the Act until the change is approved by a specified federal authority. A state or political subdivision is covered by the preclearance requirements of the Act if it maintained a specified test or device as a prerequisite to voting, and had a low voter registration or turnout, in the 1960s and early 1970s. Since 1971, Monterey County was designated as one of four of the California counties subject to the preclearance requirements of Section 5 of the Act due to California's literacy test and low voter participation in the 1968 presidential election. Kings, Yuba and Merced Counties were also subject to these requirements, although Merced County has since been relieved of this requirement.
In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on the case of Shelby County v. Holder, which held that Section 4 (b) of the Act was unconstitutional due to the fact that the voter turnout statistics used to determine coverage were out of date. Although the Justice Department declines to commit, this Court decision presumably relieved the requirement of Monterey, Kings and Yuba Counties to obtain preclearance under Section 5 of the Act. Despite this action, Monterey County has continued to submit proposed changes to the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division. Additionally, the Elections Department continues to disclose and publicize any change affecting voting in Monterey County ahead of each election.
Assembly Member Alejo's bill, AB 280, seeks to maintain voter equality in the counties of Kings, Monterey and Yuba by requiring that any changes to voting laws or procedures first be approved by California's Attorney General before enactment. AB 280 would create a state preclearance system that would remain in effect until 2019.
According to the Office of Assembly Member Luis Alejo, as of June 3, 2014, the following entities have registered positions on AB 280:
Support - Kings County Latino Roundtable
Oppose - Rural County Representatives of California
Concerns - Yuba County Board of Supervisors
OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
Information on AB 280 contained in this report was provided by the Office of Assembly Member Luis Alejo.
FINANCING
The Elections Department continues to seek Federal preclearance and therefore seeking State preclearance would send similar information to the State. However, the recent Supreme Court decision could result in ending Federal preclearance and result in cost savings to the County. Costs associated with preclearance requirements depend upon the changes proposed and the size of the election, typically costing several hundred to several thousand dollars.
Prepared by:
____________________________
Annette D'Adamo
Management Analyst III
Approved by:
____________________________
Nicholas E. Chiulos
Assistant County Administrative Officer
Attachments:
Exhibit A - AB 280
Exhibit B - AB 280 Fact Sheet
Exhibit C - U.S. Department of Justice explanation of Shelby County decision