Title
REF220020 - HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE
Public hearing to consider recommending the Board of Supervisors adopt by resolution the County of Monterey Sixth Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element Update (“HEU6”) and amendments to the 2010 General Plan, Title 21 (Zoning - Noncoastal), North County Land Use Plan, Carmel Area Land Use Plan, Coastal Implementation Plan, Title 20 (Coastal), and adopt Countywide Multiunit Objective Design Standards to implement the HEU6.
Project Location: Countywide
Proposed CEQA action: Recommend that the Board of Supervisors Certify a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (“FEIR”), adopt a Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program (“MMRP”), and adopt of a Statement of Overriding Considerations pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(1), (b) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15093(b).).
Body
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt four separate resolutions recommending that the Board of Supervisors:
1. Certify an FEIR for the County of Monterey’s HEU6, State Clearinghouse No. 2024100963; and
a. Adopt Findings of Fact;
b. Adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations;
c. Adopt an MMRP; and
d. Adopt a Statement of Reasons to Extinguish Mineral Resources
2. Adopt the County of Monterey’s HEU6 and authorize the HCD Director or designee to transmit the adopted HEU6 to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“CA HCD”) and any to make any necessary changes to achieve consistency with State Housing Element Law, subject to review by County Counsel.
3. Adopt a Resolution to implement HEU6 to:
a. Amend the North County Land Use Plan to add policies regarding the County of Monterey’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element and reclassify the land use designation of one housing opportunity site, as shown in the North County Land Use Plan Figure 1, from Residential Medium Density 1 - 4 Units/Acre to Residential High Density 5 - 30 Units/Acre;
b. Amend the Carmel Area Land Use Plan to add policies regarding the County of Monterey’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element and reclassify the land use designation of two housing opportunity sites, as shown in the Carmel Area Land Use Plan Figure 1, from Residential - Medium Density and Public/Quasi-Public to Residential - High Density;
c. Adopt an ordinance amending Monterey County Coastal Implementation Plan Part 1, the Coastal Zoning Ordinance (Monterey County Code Title 20), to implement the County of Monterey’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element in the unincorporated coastal areas of Monterey County; and
d. Approve multiunit objective design standards;
e. Direct the HCD Director or designee to transmit the proposed amendments to the California Coastal Commission for review and make any changes to achieve a finding of consistency with state housing law, subject to review by County Counsel.
4. Adopt a Resolution to implement HEU6 to:
a. Amend the 2010 General Plan (Land Use Maps, Land Use Element, Carmel Valley Master Plan, Greater Monterey Peninsula Area Plan, Fort Ord Master Plan, and Castroville Community Plan);
b. Adopt an ordinance to amend Title 21 (Non-Coastal Zoning) of the Monterey County Code to implement HEU6 as follows: amend Chapter 21.06 (Definitions), amend Chapter 21.10 (Regulations for High Density Residential Zoning Districts or “HDR” Districts), add Chapter 21.59 (By-Right Approval); and
c. Approve multiunit objective design standards;
d. Authorize the HCD Director or Designee to transmit the associated amendments required to implement HEU6 to CA HCD and make any changes to achieve a finding of consistency with State Housing Element Law, subject to review by County Counsel.
SUMMARY:
California state law requires all local governments (cities and counties) to have an adequate plan to meet the housing needs of everyone in the community, at all income levels. California’s local governments meet this requirement by adopting housing plans as part of their general plan. The County of Monterey (“County”) has been in the process of updating its adopted Housing Element to be compliant with state housing law. The County’s Sixth Cycle (2023-2031) Housing Element Update documents the County’s plan to meet the community’s housing needs as well as accommodate its RHNA throughout the planning period.
The HEU6 plans for a total of 5,897 housing units (1,256 extremely low/very low, 939 low, 712 moderate, and 2,990 above moderate units) anticipated to be provided through construction of approved pipeline housing projects, accessory dwelling units, and planned housing across 56 opportunity sites to be rezoned (fully or partially) to accommodate for high density residential development. The numbers above are inclusive of the County’s RHNA and a required buffer of approximately 15-30% by income category to comply with “no net loss” law as outlined in Government Code Section 65863. The HEU6 also includes a comprehensive housing plan (Chapter 8) that details 5 goals, 39 policies and programs, and a schedule of approximately 57 actions the County will undertake during the planning period.
The County has submitted three drafts of the HEU6 to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for review in 2024, 2025, and 2026. On May 12, 2026, CA HCD notified County staff that the 3rd draft HEU6 submitted on March 13, 2026 for review was in “statutory compliance” with state housing law. However, the County’s HEU6 cannot be found in “substantial compliance” with state housing law until the HEU6 is adopted alongside necessary policy amendments and rezonings to ensure that adequate sites (i.e. Opportunity Sites identified for rezoning in the HEU6) are available and zoned consistent with the HEU6.
As the County’s HEU6 is well past the statutory deadline for adoption (December 2023), the County is required to complete the required rezoning and implementation actions concurrent with Housing Element adoption. Upon adoption of the required amendments to the Monterey County Code, General Plan, and Local Coastal Program by the Board of Supervisors, County staff can resubmit the package to CA HCD for certification.
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission adopt four resolutions to recommend that the Board of Supervisors: certify a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report for the HEU6and adopt findings of fact, a statement of overriding considerations and a mitigation and monitoring reporting program; adopt the HEU6 and authorize the HCD Director to submit the HEU6 to CA HCD; and adopt various amendments 2010 General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and Titles 20 and 21 to implement the HEU6. The recommendation also includes authorizing the HCD Director to make any changes to ensure the finding of consistency with State Housing Element Law.
DISCUSSION:
Housing Element Update (Exhibit D, Attachment 1)
The HEU6 provides a comprehensive view of the County’s past, present, and future actions as they relate to supporting programs and housing for all needs and affordability levels.
To support both meeting the County’s RHNA targets and housing decisions for sixth cycle planning, the HEU6 does two key things:
1. It provides goals, policies and objectives to address housing needs and support future housing growth at all income levels (found in Chapter 8 - Housing Plan); and
2. It identifies an inventory of sites to show that the County has the capacity to accommodate its RHNA housing targets (found in Chapter 7 - Adequate Sites Inventory and Methodology)
Aside from these sections, much of the HEU6 focuses on providing both existing conditions analysis and local context to inform and further support the County’s policy decisions. While today’s action is focused on the necessary implementation actions, Chapter 8: Housing Plan details additional actions that the County must implement for the remainder of the Planning Period (through 2031). County staff will continue to work with the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors on future implementation actions that will drive amendments to the County’s regulations at the appropriate times.
The County began work on the HEU6 in 2022. Since then, staff have conducted multiple workshops with the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. Other outreach activities include two community workshops, release of a communitywide HEU6 survey, and presentations to City staff and various city councils countywide. Additionally, the HEU6 was posted for the state-law required public review periods. A detailed summary of the public engagement efforts including public comment received and responsive edits are in the HEU6 Appendix A - Public Engagement. The HEU6 was subsequently submitted and reviewed by CA HCD on August 20, 2024, June 25, 2025, and March 13, 2026. On May 28, 2026, CA HCD provided a letter indicated that the HEU6 was in “statutory compliance” but would not be in “substantial compliance” until necessary implementation actions and rezoning requirements were completed in accordance with state law. Information on these required implementation actions is provided below. Additional information on the HEU6 can be found in the Detailed Discussion (Exhibit B) and the Adoption Draft HEU6 (Exhibit D - Attachment 1).
Rezoning Requirements to Achieve Certification (Exhibit D, Attachment 1)
The County is required to complete the following items concurrently with adoption of the HEU6:
• Rezone Opportunity Sites to appropriate densities as required by Program H-3.A of the HEU6. Opportunity Sites are proposed to be rezoned to High Density Residential (HDR)/25 (HDR with a maximum density of 25 dwelling units to the acre) or HDR/30 (HDR with a maximum density of 30 dwelling units per acre). Properties that are either located in a public wastewater or water services district or could potentially annex into a water or wastewater service district would be allowed up to 30 dwelling units per acre. State Housing Law requires rezone sites to allow a minimum of 20 dwelling units per acre in order to be considered viable Opportunity Sites to meet RHNA needs.
• Allow for “By-Right” development for qualifying projects as defined by the California Government Code Section 65583.2(i) and as required by HEU6 Programs H-3.A, H.2-H, and H.2-D. Qualifying projects include:
o Development on Opportunity Sites and Reused Prior Housing Opportunity Sites that meets a minimum density requirement of 20 dwelling units per acre and designates 20% or more of the units as affordable to very low or low income households;
o 100% affordable housing developments on Opportunity Sites
o 100% affordable housing developments on properties within 2010 General Plan designated growth areas (Community Areas, Rural Centers, and Affordable Housing Overlay zones); and
o On land owned by religious organizations and non-profit colleges and universities that meet the provisions of Senate Bill 4 (2023).
Additionally, staff is recommending that amendments to county code to allow “by-right” housing include general reference to state law to ensure any future state mandated “by-right” housing is recognized as a qualifying development type. While this is not specifically called out in the HEU6 programs noted above, this inclusion will “future proof” the County against such possible changes to State Housing law.
As outlined in the Government Code, “use by right” shall mean that the County’s review of the multifamily residential use may not require a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit or other discretionary local government review or approval that would be considered a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Gov. Code, § 65583.2(i).) Additionally, subjective standards are not applicable to qualifying projects, as they would require discretion to determine compliance.
Historically, the County’s review process has applied discretionary regulations (i.e. subjective policies) to evaluate multifamily housing projects for a Use Permit and/or Coastal Development Permit from the Planning Commission. As the County does not have a process for approving such developments “by-right”, adoption of amendments to the County Code, 2010 General Plan and Local Coastal Program are necessary for the HEU6 to be determined “substantially compliant” with State Housing Law. Additional information on these requirements can be found in the Detailed Discussion (Exhibit B).
By-Right Housing Ordinance (Exhibit E, Attachments 1 and 2 and Exhibit F, Attachments 1 and 2)
The Monterey County Code (MCC) does not include procedures to process “by-right” development that is ministerial (non-discretionary) and subject to objective standards as described below. Consequently, the HEU6 proposes new MCC Chapters 21.59 (inland) and 20.59 (coastal) (Regulations for By-Right Housing Approval). MCC Sections 21.59.030 and 20.59.030 (Applicability) codify the requirements discussed above. For eligible projects in the Inland areas, an eligible project would be subject to issuance of a Zoning Clearance from the Chief of Planning (Chapter 21.71 Regulations for Zoning Clearances) for review and approval. For eligible projects in the Coastal area, the project would be subject to the issuance of a Coastal Administrative Permit from the Chief of Planning (Chapter 20.76 Coastal Administrative Permits). While a Coastal Administrative Permit is discretionary in nature (due to the need to demonstrate a project’s consistency with the Coastal Act), eligible projects would not require a public hearing unless specific criteria are met (MCC Section 20.76.060(B) and 20.06.312).
Sections 21.59.050 and 20.59.050 (Development Standards) detail the following development standards that qualifying projects are required to comply with. These standards include:
• Housing type - project shall consist of two or more dwelling units
• Affordability - projects are required to meet deed-restriction affordability criteria as outlined in state law (typically 45-year affordability restriction for rental units, 55-year affordability restriction for ownership units)
• Objective Standards - projects are required to comply with all applicable objective land use policies and regulations, Airport Safety Zone requirements, base zoning development standards, and Multifamily Objective Design Standards (Chapter 20.63)
• Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) Mitigation Measures - projects shall demonstrate compliance with applicable mitigation measures (identified as “OBJ” mitigations in the PEIR for the HEU6
• Replacement units - projects shall replace any demolished housing units on site as required by Government Code Section 65583.2(g)
The Chief of Planning’s project eligibility determination and requisite findings are limited to the standards specified above. By definition, any project subject to CEQA cannot qualify.
To ensure that adequate resource protection standards are in place and that the environmental impacts are adequately addressed for these “by-right” projects, Staff are also recommending both adoption of Countywide Objective Design Standards for multiunit development projects and certification of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report for the rezoning and approval processes, both required to be implemented through the HEU6 and state housing law.
Multi-unit housing projects on Opportunity Sites that do not qualify for processing in accordance with MCC Chapters 21.59 or 20.59 would still be allowed to proceed under the County’s standard review process for a multiunit housing project. For example, if a project did not meet the density requirement of 20 dwelling units per acre and 20 percent low-income affordability, the project would be subject to either an Administrative Permit or Use Permit from the Chief of Planning or Planning Commission.
Objective Design Standards (Exhibit E, Attachment 5 and Exhibit F, Attachment 12)
Recent actions by the state legislature limit the County’s ability to apply subjective architectural development standards to multifamily housing projects. Under state housing law, a project of two or more housing units (detached or attached) cannot be denied for non-compliance with subjective zoning standards (Government Code Section 65589.5). With these types of applications, jurisdictions are prevented from applying or enforcing subjective standards.
Therefore, Staff developed Countywide Objective Design Standards for the “by-right” zoning approval requirements in the HEU6. County staff will work with community members and the Planning Commission to refine these standards to be more reflective of the needs and desires of individual community areas throughout Unincorporated Monterey County as part of future HEU6 implementation. Topics that are regulated by these standards include but are not limited to: building mass, form, articulation; building and dwelling unit entrances; materials and colors; parking location and structures; site design; fencing; lighting; landscaping; and screening of mechanical equipment.
Role of the PEIR in by-right approvals (Exhibit C, Attachment 1)
To allow for streamlined approval required by the HEU6 and outlined in MCC Chapters 20.59 and 21.59, and under CEQA for development on Opportunity Sites that do not qualify for “by-right” processing, the County is providing two streamlined processing pathways:
• Objective Process (“OBJ”) This path for qualifying by-right development would be subject to the by-right housing ordinance, objective design standards, environmental protection measures established by ordinance, and other objective requirements and standards.
• Consistency Process (“CONS”) This path would be a discretionary process applying the streamlining process set forth in PRC Section 21083.3 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.
The OBJ mitigations are written as objective, quantifiable standards with which a by-right housing project would be required to comply. In drafting the standards, staff worked to identify policy issues and resource impact considerations and revise them to be applicable in situations where discretionary review or further environmental study cannot be required. These mitigations still require documentary submissions such as, for example, hydrological studies when water supply issues are identified or biological studies where impacts to special status species are identified. The goal of the OBJ mitigations is to create a checklist, “yes or no” standard to identify when specific information is required as part of a Zoning Clearance or Coastal Administrative Permit package for a by-right project.
Projects that are ineligible for by-right approval can still utilize the PEIR for CEQA streamlining, provided they are s generally consistent with the scope of the rezoning and covered by the PEIR’s impacts analysis. The main difference with the CONS process, however, is that the County has discretion to ensure a project’s compliance with its existing regulatory framework, which can include reviewing for consistency with existing policies, codes, and other criteria that may not be entirely objective.
It is important to note that if qualifying projects cannot comply with applicable objective standards (such as the OBJ mitigations listed above) or would result in a “specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety” and that there is “no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact” as defined in Government Code Section 65589.5, the project would not be eligible for “by-right approval”.
Coastal Zone Area - Land Use Plan, Coastal Implementation Plan, and Ordinance Amendments (Exhibit E - Attachments 1 through 5)
Amendments to the Local Coastal Program, Coastal Implementation Plans and Title 20 (Zoning) are focused on ensuring lateral and vertical policy consistency that allows for the required rezoning actions as discussed above. In addition to the development of a Coastal Administrative Permit review process for qualifying projects and objective design standards, the following amendments are also proposed:
• Update the High-Density Residential Land Use Designation to allow for up to 25 du/ac in the North County Land Use Plan and creation of a High-Density Residential Land Use Designation for up to 30 du/ac in the Carmel Area Land Use Plan.
• Creation of three special treatment areas to dictate requirements and applicability of the HEU6 rezoning criteria:
o One Special Treatment Area for Site 48 in the North County Land Use Plan Area
o Two Special Treatment Areas for Sites 16 and 43 in the Carmel Area Land Use Plan Area
• Amend Land Use Designation Maps
• Amend Zoning District Sectional Maps
• Add a definition for “Group Homes” in Title 20 and amend the allowed uses for various residential zoning districts to clarify that group homes with a certain number of residents is an allowed use.
• Modify MCC Chapter 20.76 and add a new definition to 20.06 to codify “minor development” and allow for the waiver of a public hearing for qualifying projects to fulfill “by-right” Coastal Administrative Permit requirements in proposed MCC Chapter 20.59
• Codify requirements in 20.63 for compliance with Multiunit Objective Design Standards for projects with two or more units
A more detailed discussion of proposed Local Coastal Program and Title 20 code amendments can be found in Exhibit B. Future amendments to the Local Coastal Program are anticipated as the County implements the HEU6 over the next five years. Staff will continue to bring forward HEU6 implementation and policy amendments to the Planning Commission for review and input prior to their adoption.
Inland Area - 2010 General Plan and Ordinance Amendments (Exhibit F, Attachments 1-11)
At this time, amendments to the 2010 General Plan and Title 21 (Zoning) are focused on ensuring lateral and vertical policy consistency that allows for the required rezoning actions as discussed above. In addition to the development of a by-right ordinance and objective design standards, the following amendments are also proposed:
• Update the High-Density Residential Land Use Designation to allow for up to 30 du/ac.
• Exempt Opportunity Sites from specific policies in the Land Use Element and Area Plans to allow for the development of the sites as contemplated in the HEU6 (i.e. unit cap restrictions do not apply)
• Amend Land Use Designation Maps
• Amend AHO Overlay Designation in the Highway 68/Airport AHO to remove the AHO designation from one parcel (APN 259-011-073-000)
• Amend Zoning District Sectional Maps
• Add a definition for “Group Homes” in Title 21 and amend the allowed uses for various residential zoning districts to clarify that group homes with a certain number of residents is an allowed use.
• Codify requirements in 21.63 for compliance with Multiunit Objective Design Standards for projects with two or more units
A more detailed discussion of proposed General Plan and Title 21 code amendments can be found in Exhibit B. It is important to note that future amendments to the 2010 General Plan and Title 21 are anticipated as the County continues to implement the HEU6 over the next five years. Staff will continue to bring forward HEU6 implementation and policy amendments to the Planning Commission for review and input prior to adoption of those policy changes.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21080(d) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines 15064(a)(1), the County as Lead Agency that an Environmental Impact Report was required for the project. As such, a Programmatic Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) (Exhibit C, Attachment 1) was prepared for the HEU6. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was available for public review from October 21, 2024 to November 20, 2024 and a public scoping meeting was held on November 7, 2024 in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15082. A Notice of Availability (NOA) was released for the Draft PEIR on July 17, 2026. The Draft PEIR was available for public review from July 17, 2026, through August 31, 2026. As three sites proposed for rezoning are located in areas of “regional mineral significance”, the County has also prepared a statement of reasons to extinguish the mineral resource rights on Opportunity Sites 46, 47, and 53. This statement has been prepared in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 2673. Staff have responded to over 250 comments from individuals, organizations and public agencies that were submitted during the public review period. These responses to comments and clarifying edits to the Draft PEIR in response comprise of the Final PEIR.
The County is required to adopt a statement of overriding considerations when certifying the PEIR. A resolution has been prepared for the Planning Commission to recommend to the Board of Supervisors that it certify the Final PEIR and adopt, 1) findings of fact; 2) a statement of overriding considerations under CEQA and 3) statement of reasons for rezoning in areas with mineral resources as required under Section 2763 of the Public Resources Code. Additional information on the Final PEIR can be found in Exhibit B.
OUTREACH
County HCD conducted multiple workshops with the community, Planning Commission, and Board of Supervisors throughout the development of the HEU6. As discussed above, the three drafts of the HEU6 were made available for public comment prior to submission to CA HCD. These comments are summarized in Appendix A - Public Engagement of the HEU6. Responses to comments on the Draft PEIR can be found in the Final PEIR under the “Responses to Comments” section. Additional information on outreach can be found in Exhibit B.
OTHER AGENCY INVOLVEMENT
County HCD staff are working in collaboration with the Office of County Counsel to review the proposed policy amendments. HCD staff have also worked with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (CA HCD) on review of the HEU6 and proposed policy amendments to ensure certification of the HEU6. HCD staff engaged with Coastal Commission staff on proposed opportunity sites as well as policy amendments in the Coastal Zone. Lastly, HCD staff presented the HEU6 and draft policy amendments to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) on January 23, 2025, December 17, 2025, and August 24, 2026. On August 24, 2026, the ALUC found the proposed amendments consistent with the Monterey Regional Airport and Marina Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plans.
HCD staff also met with staff from the City of Del Rey Oaks, City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, City of Monterey, City of Salinas and City of Greenfield on the HEU6. HCD staff presented to the city council of Del Rey Oaks, a city council subcommittee for the City of Salinas, and the city council for the City of Marina.
Prepared by: Sarah Wikle, Principal Planner 831-784-5700 and Taylor Price, Senior Planner
Approved by: Melanie Beretti, AICP, Chief of Planning, 831-755-5285
The following Exhibits are on file with HCD:
Exhibit A - Public Comment
Exhibit B - Detailed Discussion
Exhibit C - Draft CEQA Resolution, including:
• Attachment 1 - Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Report
• Attachment 2 - No Recirculation Findings
• Attachment 3 - Statement of Reasons to Permit the Proposed Use and Eliminate Access to Mineral Resources of Significance (MRZ-2)
Exhibit D - Draft Housing Element Adoption Resolution
• Attachment 1 - County of Monterey’s 2023-2031 Sixth Cycle Housing Element (Adoption Draft, dated October 2026)
Exhibit E - Draft Coastal Resolution
• Attachment 1 - Title 20 amendments and additions to Coastal Zoning Ordinance Regulations for implementation of the County of Monterey’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element in the Coastal Zone (clean)
• Attachment 2 - Title 20 amendments and additions to Coastal Zoning Ordinance Regulations for implementation of the County of Monterey’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element in the Coastal Zone (redline)
• Attachment 3 - Amendments to the Carmel Area Land Use Plan and Monterey County Coastal Implementation Plan Part 4 (Regulations for Development in the Carmel Area Land Use Plan (Chapter 20.146) (redline)
• Attachment 4 - Amendments to the North County Land Use Plan and Monterey County Coastal Implementation Plan Part 2 (Regulations for Development in the Carmel Area Land Use Plan (Chapter 20.144) (redline)
• Attachment 5 - County of Monterey Objective Design Standards for Housing Development
• Attachment 6 - Coastal Zone Zoning and Land Use Designation Maps
Exhibit F - Draft Inland Resolution
• Attachment 1 - Title 21 amendments and additions to Inland Zoning Ordinance Regulations for implementation of the County of Monterey’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element in the Non-coastal Zone (clean)
• Attachment 2 - Title 21 amendments and additions to Inland Zoning Ordinance Regulations for implementation of the County of Monterey’s Sixth Cycle Housing Element in the Non-coastal Zone (redline)
• Attachment 3 - Amendments to the County of Monterey 2010 General Plan Land Use Element (redline)
• Attachment 4 - Amendments to the County of Monterey 2010 General Plan Glossary
• Attachment 5 - Amendments to the County of Monterey 2010 General Plan Carmel Valley Master Plan (redline)
• Attachment 6 - Amendments to the County of Monterey 2010 General Plan Greater Monterey Peninsula Area Plan (redline)
• Attachment 7 - Amendments to the County of Monterey 2010 General Plan Greater Salinas Area Plan (redline)
• Attachment 8 - Amendments to the County of Monterey 2010 General Plan North County Area Plan (redline)
• Attachment 9 - Amendments to the County of Monterey 2010 General Plan Fort Ord Master Plan (redline)
• Attachment 10 - Amendments to the Castroville Community Plan (redline)
• Attachment 11 - Modification to County of Monterey 2010 General Plan Figure # AHO-2
• Attachment 12 - County of Monterey Objective Design Standards for Housing Development
• Attachment 13 - Inland Area Zone Zoning and Land Use Designation Maps
Cc: Elizabeth Gonzales, Permit Center Manager; Joshua Bowling, HCD Assistant Director; Craig Spencer, HCD Director; Melanie Beretti, Chief of Planning; Fionna Jensen, Principal Planner; Jacquelyn Nickerson, Principal Planner; Taylor Price, Senior Planner; Edgar Sanchez, Associate Planner; The Open Monterey Project (Molly Erickson); Keep Big Sur Wild; Landwatch; General Plan Elements Distribution List; Project File REF220020.