File #: 10-866    Name:
Type: Minutes Status: Passed
File created: 7/27/2010 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 7/27/2010 Final action: 7/27/2010
Title: Continued from June 8, 2010 to consider: Continued from June 8, 2010 to consider:
Attachments: 1. Completed Resolution No. 10-239, 2. Signed Board Report, 3. Exhibit B








COMPLETED RESOLUTION NO. 10-2?? ?S-2
Before the Board of Supervisors in and for the
County of Monterey, State of California
Resolution No: 10 239
Continued from June 8, 2010 to. consider:
a. Appeal by Michael Moeller from the January 26, 2010 Planning Commission denial of an
application PLN060251/Moeller) for a Lot Line Adjustment and new single family
home;
b. Application for a Combined Development Permit consisting of: 1) Coastal Development
Permit for a Lot Line Adjustment consisting of an equal exchange of land between two
legal lots of record resulting in no change of area: Lot 5 APN: 243-181-005-000/192 San
Remo Road) has 0.61 acres and Lot 6 APN: 243-181-006-000/194 San Remo Road) has
0.85 acres; 2) Coastal Administrative Permit and Design Approval to allow the
construction of a three-story 3,994 square foot single family dwelling with a 643 square
foot three-car garage, 858 square feet of deck area, and grading approximately 523 cubic
yards of cut and 89 cubic yards of fill); 3) Coastal Development Permit for development
on slopes in excess of 30%; 4) Coastal Development Permit for the removal of nine
Monterey pine trees and eight coastal live oak trees;
c. Denial of a Fee Waiver request.
PLN060251/Moeller, 192 and 194 San Remo Drive, Carmel Area Land Use Plan,
Coastal Zone)
The Moeller application PLN060251) came on for a de novo hearing before the Monterey
County Board of Supervisors on April 6, May 11, June 8, and July 27, 2010. Having
considered all the written and documentary evidence, the administrative record, the staff
report, oral testimony, and other evidence presented, the Board of Supervisors finds and
decides as follows:
FINDINGS
1. FINDING: CONSISTENCY The Project is not consistent with the applicable
plans and policies which designate this area as appropriate for
development.
EVIDENCE: a) An application PLN060251 /Moeller) was submitted by Michael
Moeller applicant") requesting a Coastal Develop...

Click here for full text