File #: BC 24-079    Name: Staff Trainer Series Classification and Compensation Study
Type: Budget Committee Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 6/13/2024 In control: Budget Committee
On agenda: 6/26/2024 Final action:
Title: a. Consider supporting the amendment of Personnel Policies and Practices Resolution (PPPR) No. 98-394 Appendix A to adjust the base wage salary ranges of the Staff Trainer I/II and Supervising Staff Trainer classifications as indicated in Attachment A; and b. Consider supporting the Human Resources Department to implement the changes in the Advantage Human Resources Management (HRM) system.
Attachments: 1. BC Report, 2. Attachment A
Date Action ByActionResultAction DetailsSearchable Meeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Title
a. Consider supporting the amendment of Personnel Policies and Practices Resolution (PPPR) No. 98-394 Appendix A to adjust the base wage salary ranges of the Staff Trainer I/II and Supervising Staff Trainer classifications as indicated in Attachment A; and
b. Consider supporting the Human Resources Department to implement the changes in the Advantage Human Resources Management (HRM) system.
Report
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Budget Committee support the following actions:
a. Consider supporting the amendment of Personnel Policies and Practices Resolution (PPPR) No. 98-394 Appendix A to adjust the base wage salary ranges of the Staff Trainer I/II and Supervising Staff Trainer classifications as indicated in Attachment A; and
b. Consider supporting the Human Resources Department to implement the changes in the Advantage Human Resources Management (HRM) system.

SUMMARY/DISCUSSION:
A classification and compensation study of the Staff Trainer classification series was requested by Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 521 on behalf of Department of Social Services employees.

The classification analysis identified that incumbents in the Staff Trainer classification series, which includes the Staff Trainer I/II and Supervising Staff Trainer classifications assigned to the Department of Social Services, were found to be performing job duties that are within the scope of their classifications and no changes are recommended.

The base wage analysis of the County comparable agencies found that, based on the duties performed, the salary of the benchmark classification of Staff Trainer II was matched to five (5) of the ten (10) comparable agencies: The Counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, San Benito, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz. After a thorough review and analysis of available data, no comparable matches were identified in the Counties of San Luis Obispo, San Mateo, or Sonoma, nor in the Cities of Monterey and Salinas. The Staff Train...

Click here for full text