File #: RES 16-042    Name:
Type: BoS Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 7/14/2016 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 7/26/2016 Final action: 7/26/2016
Title: Adopt Resolution to: a. Amend Personnel Policies and Practices Resolution No. 98-394 and associated Appendices to amend the salary range of the classification of Assistant Director of Information Technology, as indicated in the attached Resolution; b. Authorize the Auditor-Controller and the County Administrative Office to incorporate these changes in the FY 2016-17 Budget; and c. Authorize the Human Resources Department to implement the changes in the Advantage HRM system.
Attachments: 1. Board Report, 2. ITD Board Resolution-Amend Salary Range, 3. Completed Board Order & Resolution, 4. Corrected Resolution
Title
Adopt Resolution to:
a. Amend Personnel Policies and Practices Resolution No. 98-394 and associated Appendices to amend the salary range of the classification of Assistant Director of Information Technology, as indicated in the attached Resolution;
b. Authorize the Auditor-Controller and the County Administrative Office to incorporate these changes in the FY 2016-17 Budget; and
c. Authorize the Human Resources Department to implement the changes in the Advantage HRM system.

Report
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended, effective July 26, 2016, the Board of Supervisors take the following actions:
a. Amend Personnel Policies and Practices Resolution No. 98-394 and associated Appendices to amend the salary range of the classification of Assistant Director of Information Technology, as indicated in the attached Resolution;
b. Authorize the Auditor-Controller and the County Administrative Office to incorporate these changes in the FY 2016-17 Budget; and
c. Authorize the Human Resources Department to implement the changes in the Advantage HRM system.

SUMMARY:
Upon completion of a wage study, it is recommended the salary range of the classification of Assistant Director of Information Technology be amended to a salary range that most accurately reflects the current labor market agency mean.

DISCUSSION:
On February 9, 2016, the Board approved the addition of an Assistant Director of Information Technology position allocation in the Information Technology Department's Budget. The addition of this position was intended to support succession planning efforts, and ensure continuity of services and leadership within the organization.

In reviewing internal salary data in preparation for recruitment efforts for the newly created position, it was discovered that the salary differential between the Division Manager- Information Technology class and Assistant Director of Information Technology class was only 3%, indicating salary compaction between the two classifica...

Click here for full text