File #: RES 16-044    Name: PLN040529 - Vasquez
Type: BoS Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 8/10/2016 In control: Board of Supervisors
On agenda: 8/23/2016 Final action: 8/23/2016
Title: PLN040529 - Vasquez Adopt a resolution rescinding the April 08, 2014 Board of Supervisors action on the appeal by Maria A. Vasquez Et Al (PLN040529) of the Planning Commission's denial of a three lot parcel map. Proposed CEQA Action: Statutorily exempt per Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines. 34735 Metz Road, Soledad, Central Salinas Valley Area Plan
Attachments: 1. Board Report, 2. Attachment A - Draft Resolution, 3. Completed Board Order & Resolution
Title
PLN040529 - Vasquez
Adopt a resolution rescinding the April 08, 2014 Board of Supervisors action on the appeal by Maria A. Vasquez Et Al (PLN040529) of the Planning Commission's denial of a three lot parcel map.
Proposed CEQA Action: Statutorily exempt per Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines.
34735 Metz Road, Soledad, Central Salinas Valley Area Plan
Report
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors adopt a resolution to:
a. Determine that rescinding the 2014 Board action is Statutorily Exempted by CEQA Guidelines Section 15270
b. Rescind the April 08, 2014 Board of Supervisors action on the appeal by Maria A. Vasquez Et Al (PLN040529) of the Planning Commission's denial of a three lot parcel map.

PROJECT INFORMATION:
Owner: Maria A. Vasquez Et Al (Fermin and Tony Vasquez)
APN: 257-121-019-000
Zoning: LDR/2.5
Lot Size: 9.24 acres
Agent: Jacqueline M. Zischke
Plan Area: Central Salinas Valley Area Plan
Flagged and Staked: No

SUMMARY:
On April 08, 2014, the Board of Supervisors considered an appeal of the subject application for a minor subdivision (PLN040529). A tie vote resulted in a determination that the minor subdivision was not approved. The Superior Court of California remanded the subject application (PLN040529) back to the Board of Supervisors for further consideration. This action would simply rescind the prior action thereby allowing the project to be reconsidered by the Board. Consideration of the project merits will be brought back to the Board of Supervisors at a future date.

DISCUSSION:
On April 8, 2014, the Board of Supervisors considered an appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a three lot minor subdivision. The Planning Commission decision was based on the inability to prove adequate water quality and quantity. The Board of Supervisors voted 2-2 on a motion to approve the minor subdivision. This tie vote would not uphold or deny the appeal, so

the Board then voted on a motion to determine that t...

Click here for full text